The recent amendment to the Nigeria Police Act, 2020, which extends Inspector General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun’s tenure beyond the statutory retirement age, has raised concerns among stakeholders about political motivations, potential abuse of power, and a weakening commitment to transparency.
Several organizations, including the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, have voiced their opposition, warning that the move could set a dangerous precedent for future legislative manipulations. Analysts caution that bypassing due process in such critical appointments may undermine democratic principles.
Civil society groups, led by the Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC), have urged President Bola Tinubu to uphold constitutional guidelines in appointing future IGPs. In a statement signed by RULAAC Executive Director Okechukwu Nwanguma, the groups stressed the importance of preserving the integrity of the police force and ensuring national unity.
Senate Passes Amendment Despite Public Outcry
On July 23, 2024, SaharaReporters revealed that the Nigerian Senate had passed the contentious Police Act (Amendment) Bill 2024, initially proposed by President Tinubu to extend the retirement age of police officers from 60 to 65 years and their service tenure from 35 to 40 years. However, this bill had earlier faced strong resistance from stakeholders during a June 26, 2024, hearing by the House of Representatives Committee on Police Affairs.
Inside sources alleged that IGP Egbetokun was a key proponent of the bill, reportedly allocating significant funds to lobby for its passage. The proposed changes faced stiff opposition from the Police Service Commission (PSC), the Ministry of Police Affairs, and the National Salaries and Wages Commission, all of whom warned that the extension could negatively impact the police force’s efficiency, morale, and career progression.
Senior police officers also expressed frustration, describing the move as self-serving. The Ministry of Police Affairs warned that increasing service years would lead to stagnation, hinder innovation, and potentially set a precedent for similar demands from military and paramilitary organizations.
Police Force Defends Amendment
In response to the backlash, Force spokesperson Olumuyiwa Adejobi defended the amendment, stating that it was first introduced during the 8th Assembly but failed to advance before the assembly’s dissolution. He emphasized that legislative reviews of service conditions are standard practice to align with national realities, dismissing claims that the bill serves personal interests.
Despite this defense, critics argue that the swift passage of the amendment amid widespread opposition underscores the ongoing tensions between government authority and adherence to due process in Nigeria. As the debate intensifies, observers stress that ensuring transparency in governance remains crucial to maintaining public trust and the democratic integrity of the country.
